full story:
http://www.oem.com.mx/elsoldetoluca/notas/n927503.htm
El Sol de Toluca
November 11, 2008
Violeta Huerta President of the Coordinating Board policy of the local Chamber of Deputies, Juan Carlos Núñez Armas, said that the attorney general accountable mexiquense around work made in the trial of former Mayor Zinacantepec, Leonardo Bravo Hernández, so ask the Attorney General Alberto Bazbaz information about this asunto.Además, he said, require compliance with the warrant of arrest against the former treasurer, Daniel Mortera, since is a cornerstone in that case and found that another key element which is not deepened in the removal of original documents from the council, by which the Office should initiate a complaint by trade, as they are essential to quantify the amount of embezzlement and require the reimbursement of dinero.Durante an interview said that the responsibility for the information provided for the trial of embezzlement by nearly 100 million dollars is not just the Supreme Audit Body, but also the judge and prosecutors, who must be accountable for the work he did, and report how they are going investigations. "The responsibility is on the whole I do not think that is only the Superior Body Control, you must also focus on other, there are at least three implications: the Body, the public prosecutor and the judge. The organ provided the elements that led to the Attorney, so is necessary that the Office of the explanation for. "The body was as a technical advisor with the material presented in any case, the Director Accountability that was the case also must give an accounting and say, well things are, not just the coach solely responsible. The executor, the operative part, in defense of society was the attorney that I think should be required to submit bills. "Armas Núñez said that while not apprehend the former treasurer did not know what happened to the nearly 100 million pesos, This will be the requirement that the Attorney Bazbaz Sacal compliance with the warrant of Mortera, to explain what happened in the trial of Leonardo Bravo and investigate the theft of documents, thus the lack of these papers could not quantify the amount. "Missing item has not delved into it, the removal of original documents is one of the parties with whom there is another crime that was full proof, I think that there should be at least one complaint of office by the attorney, ie where are the originals?, if not in the body, or at City Hall, someone took away. "Or is the former president and was the former treasurer and a involved and there must be accountability. Ask to meet the warrant requirement is the advance, which can not be that 90 million dollars remaining on a penalty that sounds more like a waiver, he is considered guilty, but even the compensation of 90 million pesos, not even require because you can not quantify, but someone must be responsible, "he said. (S)
0 comments:
Post a Comment